IJBMAS - Impact of Human Factors in Implementing Aviation Digital Systems - (PhD article)
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Vol.4.Issue.4.2017
Oct-Dec
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS, MANAGEMENT AND
ALLIED SCIENCES
(IJBMAS)
A Peer Reviewed International
Research Journal
Impact of Human Factors in Implementing
Aviation Digital Systems
JoJo Williams1, Dr.C.Sengottuvelu2
1Research Scholar,Bharathiar University, Coimbatore,
Tamil Nadu, India.
2Research Supervisor, Professor & Doctoral
SCMS Cochin School of Business, Prathap Nagar, Muttom, CochinKerala, India.
|
|
ABSTRACT The purpose of this research is to understand the effect of human
factors in multi-cultural, multi-ethnic and mixed gender work environments in
the aviation industry, and with specific emphasis on the impact of specific
human factors on large scale implementation of aviation digital systems
projects, like the implementation of a new fleet of Boeing 777 or Airbus 320
fleets latest digital systems technologies. This study is important as it
discusses how specific human factors identified from a group of multiple
research factors identified by researcher earlier affects the management of
projects in the aviation industry. This study will provide valuable insights
for management to recognize the impact of human factors and evaluate its
impact on project outcomes. Keywords: aviation
industry, HR, human factors, aviation projects, aviation project management |
Introduction
This research studies the impact of human
resources practices on aviation software project outcomes. The implementation
of any new aviation fleet related procurement projects is complicated and time
consuming, and requires months of preparation, focus and readiness, although
the outcome of the result is enhanced passenger and cargo services for the
public. It is once in a decade, or even decades, event for many airlines and
costly to implement. Since a number of years the airline sector has been
steadily improving and thereby a great deal of advanced planning is required,
in the type of aircraft to be procured, its sustainability and maintenance in
the long run, its profitability to the airline, the various aircraft specs and
features to be in place, training for the crew and pilots, and various
licensing and approval processes that need to be completed before the aircraft
can be delivered to the airline flight operations team for departure. The
airline business is one of the most competitive industries in the economy
(Jarach, 2002), and many of these aviation projects while not only being
expensive are also high risk projects as there is a considerable strain on the
finances of the airline, and its setup and execution must be carried out
effectively so as not to the affect the overall balance sheet of the airline
during the implementation period. It is also difficult and tedious, while at the
same time very costly, to procure and release new aircraft due to the
tremendously needed time and highly skilled human resources.
This
study helps to understand and discusses how the human factor affects the
airline procurement process in the Middle Eastern airline. This study will also
help other related studies on the subject in the aviation industry. This study
will also look into the readiness of the human resources in undertaking a
project of this nature, and how it has been executed in the best possible
manner, and thereby an overall success for the airline where the project had
been implemented.
The airline is currently completed the
procurement process of a new fleet of Airbus and Boeing aircraft, and is now in
the early stages of setting up the aircraft for its final inclusion into the
active fleet of the company. The last few months have been crucial to the
project implementation and made it possible for the researcher to monitor and
observer closely the human factors that were at play during the airline
procurement and implementation of onboard avionics digital systems projects,
and flight operations and flight planning systems projects. Further, this study
can be used as a start for other future case studies and research regarding the
airline procurement projects, its related digital systems implementation, and
related human resource factors during the procurement and implementation phases
of the project.
Airline profile
The airline procurement project and the
related human factors were studied at a middle east corporate airline whose
main line of business is scheduled air passenger carriage. The airline has been
in operation over 50 years, making it one oldest airlines in the world. Airline
also provides the carriage of air cargo through its Cargo unit. One of its
unique strength is highly skilled and committed workforce. Every employee is
given an equal opportunity to develop themselves and grow in their career.
Continuous training, positive work environment, participative style of
management have all ensured development of a committed and motivated workforce
setting higher limits in terms of productivity and quality of project
execution.
Review of Literature
There are multiple human factors that come
into play when a project is implemented. Some of the more critical factors that
have been identified by researchers over a period of time are related to
management support, skilled manpower or staff, change management and resistance
to change, commitment, work pressure and stress, communication all of which are
only some of the human factors at play during a project. Change management is
one of the core issues facing any company. Resistance to change is one of the core
issues faced by organizations when changes are proposed. There is both a
psychological reaction, and a behavioural resistance that highlight the
unwillingness to accept modifications, and consequently, a lack of commitment
to support the changes, which limits the chances of success in the project
(Chawla and Kelloway, 2004). Human factors were identified by Pasian (2011) in
her examination of project management models, and was necessary to achieve
reliable but flexible project management capability. Human factors was
highlighted by Betts and Lansley (1995) in the review of the first ten years of
international journal of project management. The aviation industry is faced
with a lot challenges and especially with references to the implementation of
latest aircraft digital system human factors need to be considered. These
digital systems require a faster turnaround than other ground based IT systems
as aircraft come and go at a fast pace during the lifecycle of their
operations, except for a short while for various maintenance checks on the
ground, and thereby with workers being on high pressure in a complex
environment with highly complex systems, management support and adequate
training and monetary resources and all required support are necessary for the
safety of the aircraft. Various events in the 80’s and 90’s have shown that
human factors played a part in the crashes and accidents in the aviation
sector, as shown in Fig. 1
Figure 1: Human Causes in Aviation Incidents (IATA,
1975)
Management support during the
implementation of complex digital systems in airlines, as individuals are
emotional affected by the organizational change experience (Kiefer, 2002). The purpose of IT systems in any organization
is to improve the performance of its employees (McNurlin & Sprague,
2006). Another human factor critical to
the implementation of complex aviation systems is adequate training. The
purpose of training is to achieve the purposes of organizations and the
employees (Stone R.J., 2002). Training increases the efficiency and the
effectiveness of the airline engineers thus above all ensuring the safety of
the aircraft and its passengers. Therefore it is necessary for the airline to
design the training very carefully, and the design of the training should be as
per the needs of the airline employees (Ginsberg, 1997). Thereby, training has
to be on the job which will familiarize the ground engineers to get the
knowledge of the job in a better way (Deming, 1982). It is clearly understood
that trained employees perform well when compared to untrained employees
(Partlow, 1996). To achieve the overall goals of the organization training has
to be rightly given to its employees (Flynn et al., 1995). Training, especially
in the airline industry, can be expensive, however, although training can be
costly, in the long it can give back more than it took (Flynn et al., 1995).
According
to the need and at various stages of the organizations process, the
organization should develop its employees so that they can compete with their
competitors (Carlos Braga, 1995). However, any important training has to be
designed very carefully (Michael Armstrong, 2000), and the training should be
according to the needs of the staff (Ginsberg, 1997), and in this case airline
engineers. It is also better to give on the job training as it reduces cost and
saves time (Flynn et al., 1995), and on the job training because it is cost
effective and time saving (Ruth Taylor et al., 2004). Human resource management
practices are vital for development of organizations (Paul and Anantharaman,
2003). Training is provided to improve the performance of individuals and
groups in a organization setting. (Vinesh, 2014). Training is done to gain a
better advantage in order to enhance their effectiveness (Devi and Shaik,
2012). Training is defined as the planned learning experience that teach
employees how to perform current and future jobs (Tahrir et al, 2014), and it
increases the turnover of the organization, and helps with the development of
the organization.
OBJECTIVES
The main aim of this research is to identify
predominant human resource factors and how it has impacted the implementation
of the aviation digital systems projects for the newly purchased fleet of the
airline. Some key projects include the e-enablement project, which provides a
way for airlines to receive software digital parts for the aircraft, to the
implementation of maintenance, repair and overhaul systems software for the
maintenance of the aircraft. During various phases of the project, it was observed
there were certain delays to the project, and the reference was often
highlighted as lack of management support during the various project stages, or
the lack of adequate training. The study hopes to ascertain if there is a
correlation between the implementation of the system and management support for
project management and training of the staff.
Population and Sample
Research consists of both primary and
secondary data, and the primary data was obtained through a structured
questionnaire from the various cross sections of the airline, but with specific
emphasis on the ground engineering staff that closely worked on the
implementation of the aircraft digital systems implementation projects. The
estimated strength of the airline support staff was around 1800, and sample
size of this population to achieve an acceptable size for the research and
further analysis was 300 (Sekaran, 2006). About 550 questionnaires were
distributed by email, survey sites and links, or by other means to the staff at
the various buildings of the airline, and about 300 were considered valid for
further analysis. The questionnaire was divided into 5 points according to
Likert type scale, and was assigned level 5 for strongly agree, level 4 for
agree, level 3 for neutral, level 2 for disagree, and level 1 for strongly
disagree.
Hypothesis
Ha: There exists a relation between systems
implementation team and top management support in implementation of aviation
digital systems.
Hb: There exists a relation between systems
implementation team and adequate training in implementation of aviation digital
systems.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Analysis of the statistics was done using
SPSS (statistical package for social sciences) to analyze each item in the
questionnaire. Cronbach’s alpha was used to verify the reliability of the
questionnaire. Pearson’s correlation was used to test and find a correlation
between the dependent and independent variables. A high correlation means that
two or more variables have a strong relationship with each other while a low
correlation means that the variables are hardly related. The range of
correlation coefficients can range between -1.00 and +1.00. If the value is 0,
it means that there is no relationship between the variable under testing.
For the
questionnaire, cronbach’s alpha for all the areas to be tested was taken to
test the reliability of each area and alpha value was found to be .871.
Cronbach's alpha (α) is 0.871, which indicates a high level of internal
consistency, and, higher values of
Cronbach's alpha show high reliability of the questionnaire.
Analysis and Results
The
demographic characteristics of the sample are highlighted below for a sample of
300:
Gender:
|
Variable |
Frequency |
|
Male |
188 |
|
Female |
112 |
Age:
|
20-30 years |
88 |
|
31-40 years |
126 |
|
41- 50 years |
86 |
Occupation
|
Management |
46 |
|
Aircraft Engineers |
172 |
|
Other Ground Staff |
82 |
Experience:
|
Less than 10 years |
78 |
|
11-15 years |
38 |
|
16-20 years |
96 |
|
21 years + |
88 |
First the hypothesis, Ha i.e. Ha: there
exists a relation between systems implementation team and top management
support in implementation of aviation digital systems, is tested.
To test the hypothesis, first calculated the
means and standard deviation of each item, and then Pearson Correlation was
calculated. Table 1 to 5 show the results of the analysis.
First, table 1 shows there is a general mean
in the disagree level, although there is a standard deviation of .710 and
above.
Table 1: Descriptive
statistics for project team and managerial support by senior management
|
|
Mean |
Std. Deviation |
|
did management provide project managers for
e-enabling projects |
2.48 |
.710 |
|
did management support the selected project
managers |
2.56 |
.805 |
|
did management support the project team |
2.54 |
.781 |
|
did management provide money and travel
resources for project |
2.54 |
.794 |
|
|
|
|
Table 2: Descriptive
Statistics for top management support
|
|
Mean |
Std. Deviation |
|
did top management support in final
decision making of project phases |
2.53 |
.790 |
|
did top management encourage employee
participation in the project |
2.53 |
.794 |
Table 3: Relation
between systems implementation project team and management support
|
Correlations |
|||
|
|
systems |
management |
|
|
systems |
Pearson Correlation |
1 |
.923** |
|
Sig. (2-tailed) |
|
.000 |
|
|
N |
300 |
300 |
|
|
management |
Pearson Correlation |
.923** |
1 |
|
Sig. (2-tailed) |
.000 |
|
|
|
N |
300 |
300 |
|
|
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01
level (2-tailed). |
|||
Referring to the table 3 above, the
hypothesis Ha can be inferred as that there is a significant correlation
between systems implementation project and management support, however, the
lack of sufficient support of management to the project teams can result in
considerable strain for the project team to successfully implement the digital
systems projects.
Second the hypothesis, Hb i.e Hb: Hb: there
exists a relation between systems implementation team and adequate training in
implementation of aviation digital systems, is tested.
Here, table 4 shows there is a general mean
in the disagree level, although there is a standard deviation of .747 and
above.
Table 4: Descriptive
Statistics for training for the digital systems implementation
|
|
Mean |
Std. Deviation |
|
was training provided help end users and
engineers |
2.53 |
.782 |
|
was a proper plan in place for the complex
training |
2.52 |
.747 |
|
was the training done by qualified users |
2.52 |
.747 |
|
was the training first done on test
e-enabling systems |
2.51 |
.752 |
Table 5: Relation
between systems implementation project team and adequate training
|
Correlations |
|||
|
|
systems |
training |
|
|
systems |
Pearson Correlation |
1 |
.953** |
|
Sig. (2-tailed) |
|
.000 |
|
|
N |
300 |
300 |
|
|
training |
Pearson Correlation |
.953** |
1 |
|
Sig. (2-tailed) |
.000 |
|
|
|
N |
300 |
300 |
|
|
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01
level (2-tailed). |
|||
Referring to the table 5 above, the
hypothesis Hb can be inferred as that there is a significant correlation
between systems implementation project and adequate training requiements,
however, the lack of project team support to the end users in the training
required to support the new digital systems can result in safety and other
issues related to the airlines activity and this needs to be considered
carefully.
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION
The purpose of this study has been to
highlight the correlation between management support to the project teams, and
the project teams support to the end user training in the implementation of
aviation digital systems. The success of the highly complex aviation systems,
as seen by the study rests of the overall support of senior management to the
teams involved, and ensuring adequate training is provided.
To resolve these issues, senior management
should allocate sufficient time to oversee the right project teams are in
place, and allocate sufficient funds for the middle management to undertake
their tasks successfully. Training courses and seminars need to be conducted
regularly to highlight to end users to be well equipped in undertaking their
tasks once the digital systems have been implemented.
References
[1].
Betts, M. &. (1995). International Journal of Project Management
- A review of the first ten years. International Journal of Project
Management, 13(4), 207-217.
[2].
Braga., C. A. (1995). The impact of the internationalization of
Services on Developing Countries. Article based on a World Bank Report.
Retrieved from www.worldbank.org/fandd/english/0396/articles/070396.htm.
[3].
Chawla, A., & Kelloway, E. (2004). Predicting openness and
commitment change. . Leadership and Organization Development Journal.
[4].
D., J. (2002). The digitalisation of market relationships in the
airline business: the impact and prospects of e-business. Journal of Air
Transport Management, Vol. 8, Issue 2, pp. 115-120.
[5].
Deming, W. (1982). Quality, Productivity and Competitive Position.
Cambridge, MA: Center for Advanced Engineering.
[6].
Devi, V. a. (2012). Training and Development - A jump starter for
employee performance and organizational effectiveness. International
Journal of Social Science and Interdisciplinary Research, 1(7), 2277-3630.
[7].
Flynn, B. S. (1995). The impact of quality management practices on
performance and competitive advantage. Decision Sciences, Vol. 26, pp.
659-91.
[8].
Ginsberg. (1997). Training for the Long Haul. Computer Shopper,
Vol. 17, P. 4.
[9].
Kiefer, T. (2002). Understanding the emotional experience of
organizational change - evidence. Advances in Developing Human Resources,
v. 4, n. 1, p. 39-61.
[10].
McNurlin, B. &. (2006). Information Systems Management in
Practice. Perason Prentice Hall.
[11].
Partlow, C. (1996). Human Resources Practices of TQM Hotels.
Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, Vol. 37 No. 5, pp. 66-77.
[12].
Pasian, B. (2011). Project management maturity- A critical
examination of existing and emergent contributing factors . Professional
Doctorate - Project Management.
[13].
Paul, A. A. (2003). Impact of people management practices on
organizational performance - Analysis of a causal model. The international journal
of human resource management, 14(7), 1246-1266.
[14].
R.J., S. (2002). Human Resource Management. John Wiley and Sonns.
[15].
Ruth Taylor, D. D. (2004). Aspects of training and remuneration in
the accommodation industry. Journal of European Industrial Training. Vol.
28(6), pp 1-2.
[16].
Tahir, J. Y. (2014). The impact of training and development on
employees performance and productivity . International Journal of Academic
Research in Business and Social Sciences, 4(4).
[17].
Vinesh. (2014). Role of training and development in an organizational
development. International Journal of Management and International Business
Studies, 4(2), 213-220.

Comments
Post a Comment